The story of Small Property Owner P. C.

Summary: A 66 years old female homeowner P. C. is suffering from stress because her 40 years old engineer tenant hasn’t paid rent for 3 1/2 years.

Landlord Story Input Form: The intent of this form is used as a guidance for landlords to inform our legislatures in writing and allow them to understand more of landlords’ situations. BetterHousingPolicies.org will be keeping this for our record and sharing with the legislatures,  posting on our websites, social media and sharing with the public. It is very important that you are stating the facts and the actual event that happened. You may write it in Chinese, call or Wechat Tina Wong and we will try our best to help you translate it into English. Please email it to tinacwong@betterhousingpolicies.org.

Today’s date: 05/30/2020

Your initial: PC

Are you a registered voter?  Yes

Tell us about you

1) How many people are in your household and who are they?

Currently 3 people: Me, my daughter, and my partner.

Previously, there were 6 people: Me, my husband, my daughter, my son, my mother, and my father-in-law. 

2) What was the combined household income at the time when you purchased the property?

 I purchased it 30 years ago and don’t remember.

3) What kind of job did you do when you purchased the property?    

I was a medical record clerk when I 1st purchased the property and had 2 other part time jobs after 2nd year of purchase. My husband was a contractor working 6-7 days a week.

4) What city did this happen?   

San Francisco 

5) Which district is this property located?    

Mission Terrace

6) What type of property, condo, Single family residence (SFR), 2-4 units or 5 units and more?  

 SFR; front is a one story with 2 bedrooms and 1 bath; my husband made a permitted 3-story addition in the back in 2005 for our family.

 7) Is this a rent control unit or property?  

Yes, because I separated the front portion and back addition where we currently live. I rent out the front portion of the property. 

 8) Why did you lease out part of your property?     

My husband passed away in Jan 2006, my father in-law also passed away in March 2006, my daughter left for college in 2006 and my son also left for college in 2007. 

Between 2007 and 2010, I would rush back to my mom’s senior apartment to take care of her overnight after work, and did not spend as much time at home because of this. 

Since I was spending less time at the house and everyone moved out, it only made sense to rent out the front portion of the house. I also needed the extra income to pay the mortgage, my children’s college education, and support my aging mother. That is why I leased out the front portion of the house in 2007.

9) When did the lease start and end, how much was the rent?  

Lease started on Feb. 21, 2007 and was a one year lease. The rent started at $1,600 and the current rent should be $1,730 per month. 

10) Background of tenants at the time of leasing your property, profession and number of their household? 

The tenant is a 40 years old Canadian who was working in Silicon Valley and had to relocate to work in SF. He showed me his stock statement and bank statements with a total around $300,000 in stock and cash value, he was also driving a nice car, I think it was a Mercedes Benz. He mentioned to my leasing agent that he was going to stay just a year or so plan to buy his own property. He would be the only person living there. He has not worked since 2016, and I believe he felt he did not need to go back to work as he’s not been paying rent and, thus, getting free housing from me. 

11) When did you 1st find out the situation that the tenant was not paying rent, you may just provide the year if you don’t remember the month and day?   

He stopped paying rent at the end of 2016. 

12) What was the situation and event, please describe in detail as much as possible: 

I wanted to regain the front unit of the home, as we needed more space. My son moved back from college in 2015 and my daughter moved back about a year later with her boyfriend. I am also getting older and it has been difficult for me to walk up the many stairs to my bedroom from the back unit where we lived (our home is built on a slope), so I wanted to move into the front of the house as it is just one story.

I believe I discussed this with the tenant early in 2016 and offered to pay him a relocation fee for the Owner Move-In eviction. He signed an agreement with me and I paid him ½ of the relocation fee required according to the SF Rent Board fee schedule, he accepted and cashed the check. Then he stopped paying rent at the end of 2016 and he verbally told me that he lost his job. He said that he could not find a suitable property he wanted to rent so he refused to pay rent or move out. He also claimed that he was entitled to stay without paying rent under the San Francisco rental ordinance and said he has tenant’s rights in San Francisco. I hired an attorney in Jan 2017 and started the eviction process due to non-payment of rent until now. He still has not paid rent after 3.5 years. 

13) What did you do to handle the situation, please describe in detail as much as possible.

I want to start off by saying that the legal process is very complicated and very difficult for me to comprehend as English is not my first language. Even my daughter, who has been helping me with this process and whose first language is English, has trouble understanding everything that has transpired, even after consulting with the lawyer to get more clarity. 

  1. I hired my first attorney in January 2017 for the unlawful detainer case, and worked with him until November 2017. There was some sort of blocker created by the tenant and the attorney wasn’t able to proceed, which is when I moved the case to another attorney.
  2. I started working with my second attorney in November 2017 and am still working with him. Again, it is difficult to describe exactly what has occurred over the past 3.5 years with the lawyers, legal filings, court appearances because so much has happened that was difficult to understand. (You may look at the court records to get the detailed information.) 

What I can say is that I have accompanied the attorney to court on several occasions and have seen him speak with different judges in court. We never got a judgement. We could have easily From what the attorney shared with me, it seems that the judges and the courts tend to be sympathetic to the plight of tenants, and thus approving their requests for extensions and appeals. This is basically what has been going on for the past 3.5 years. The tenant would find ways to stall the case, and has been very successful at it. The tenant, himself, even filed for the case to be reclassified from limited to unlimited – yet another tactic to create delays. There were times when he also did not show up in court, yet somehow would still get his way to delay things. 

I often wonder if the courts ever made an error or missed something that would allow the tenant to get all of these extensions and other requests granted.

From what I recall the case has also been appealed twice by the tenant. During the most recent one in late 2018, my attorney even had to hire a specialized Appellate attorney to work on the appeals case. This cost me an extra ~$15,000, and extended the case until spring of 2019 – over an entire year! My daughter and I attended this hearing and it was clear that even the judges felt that this case was a waste of time as his reasons for non payment of rent for 3.5 years is irrelevant. I want to emphasize that this man is wasting the courts’ precious time and resources. In fact, he is wasting everyone’s time and resources. Why are they allowing such ridiculousness? His reasons for non payment of rent do not make sense. He is playing games and the courts should not find this acceptable. This case needs to be prioritized and expedited by the courts.

We are waiting for the case to go to trial court, but due to COVID-19, everything is now on hold – again. We just want to get this over with. All the pain, time, and financial hardship this has caused our family is unnecessary and needs to end. 

14) How did the situation get resolved or has it been solved?

It still has not been resolved since the end of 2016. 

15) Are the same tenants still living there? 

Yes

16) Did the tenants damage your property when they moved out and how it was damaged, do you have any evidence such as photos or videos?

He has not moved out yet. The last inspection and every inspection I did, I had to call a sheriff in order to get in. He has also locked the door from the inside during one of the inspections, even though I gave him a 24 hour notice. He would not let us in and I had to call a locksmith and the police to get in. He has garbage and debris throughout the property, black out shade installed, Christmas lighting installed along the baseboard, and took out all light bulbs. I have no clue what he is doing inside. Because of this entire situation and his demeanor, I often feel scared.

17)  How much money did it cost you for repairs?

I haven’t been able to make any repairs. This was a newly remodeled property when the tenant moved in, but current condition is unknown because the tenant refused to let me inspect my own property. I needed to call the sheriff for contractors and myself to get in to repair things, such as plumbing leaks, which I suspected was due to excessive water usage. I am not even allowed to go inside my own property, even with the 24 hour advanced notices. 

18)  How much money did you pay your attorney?

I have spent $51,000 in attorney fees and have not received a total of  $72,660 in non payment of rent that he owes me over the 3 1/2 years. The rent is currently $1,730/month has not been collected since the end of 2016 plus utilities fee.

19)  Did your insurance company pay any money to those tenants for any settlements?

Insurance is not covered.  I have to use my savings for attorney fees.

20) How much did your insurance premium go up after insurance paid the settlement?

I could not claim any insurance, so insurance did not go up.

21) How did you feel about the whole ordeal? 

  1. I am angry and frustrated but numb! 
  2.  I.  I am a 66 years old Chinese woman that is taking care of my 95 years old mom. My mom wants to move back in with me, as she is very old now and afraid to sleep alone needs 24hours care, but I don’t have the space. I cannot even accommodate my own mother because of this squatter. 

II. I have been stressed because of the current situation, and so angry and frustrated with the tenant not paying rent. He is basically taking advantage of me. I feel like he’s robbing me of my hard earned money, my savings, my happiness, and my peace. I should be able to retire soon, but I don’t even know when this would be possible. I am still paying attorney fees and not collecting rent. I was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2018, which has also taken a toll on me physically, mentally, and emotionally. 

III.  In February 2020, I broke my hip and leg. This is a very serious injury and surgery. I was not able to stay in my own house during the recovery, again because of the many steps and multiple stories there in the back unit, where I resided. I had to stay somewhere else, which is ridiculous. It is ridiculous that I still cannot reclaim the front unit of my house (where I could have recovered) because of this unlawful detainer and non payment of rent. This is a house I worked very hard for, and now I feel as if someone else owns it and is holding it hostage from me. 

IV.   My children had wanted to come back home, but there is not enough space to accommodate everyone. Now my son has had to rent a room elsewhere. This is ridiculous that I cannot provide housing to my own son and he has to pay rent to live elsewhere, because we cannot get our property back. This is no longer an owner move in but an unlawful detainer.

V.  I am still working and CANNOT retire because I still have attorney fees and am essentially supporting a squatter who is taking advantage of me. 

  1. Before I swore an oath to become a US citizen, I studied 100 questions and answers. I thought I swore into the US Constitution and the supreme law of the land. The current state legislature and SF supervisors do not protect people like me, who worked hard to achieve the American Dream. I came here as an immigrant, learned English, worked multiple jobs per day, 7 days a week, and was finally able to purchase a home. Now, I am taken advantage of, I feel violated, I feel robbed, and I feel as if I have no rights. 

I want to reference the Capitalist and Market Economy Systems, Rule of Law and the Cold War between the Soviet Union and the United States. 

  1. Capitalist and Market Economy Systems – The economic system of the United States is capitalism. In the American economy, most businesses are privately owned. Competition and profit motivate businesses. Businesses and consumers interact in the marketplace, where prices can be negotiated. This is called a “market economy.” In a market economy, businesses decide what to produce, how much to produce, and what to charge. Consumers decide what, when, and where they will buy goods or services. In a market economy, competition, supply, and demand influence the decisions of businesses and consumers.
  2. Rule of Law– Everyone must follow the law. Leaders must obey the law. Government must obey the law and no one is above the law. 
  3. During the Cold War – “The main concern of the United States during the Cold War was the spread of communism. The Soviet Union (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, or USSR) was a powerful nation that operated under the principles of communism. The United States and its allies believed that a democratic government and a capitalist economy were the best ways to preserve individual rights and freedoms. The United States and its allies feared the expansion of communism to countries outside the Soviet Union.”

California and San Francisco has become a socialist state and city by rewarding people who do not take responsibility and who do not contribute to society and only take government money and blame housing providers for the consequences of their own actions. Why am I to be punished? Why do I have to house someone for FREE? Why can’t I take back my own property even after 3.5 years of non payment of rent? WHY IS IT TAKING THIS LONG? 

22) What did you learn from this ordeal?

  1. I am wary of tenants in San Francisco and have shared with many people my story. Because of this, I have discouraged people from renting their property in San Francisco as it has proved to be very dangerous for landlords here. 
  2. I have been oppressed and abused by the government legislature, which only protects the people who do not abide by or respect contract rights and promote tenants to take advantage of housing providers. The Board of Supervisors only care for how many votes they can get to retain in their seats. It is sad that I cannot trust the government or law makers in San Francisco. The law here does not help hard working people like me. It seems to only protect squatters, like my “tenant”. Why else am I still fighting to get my property back after 3.5 years of non payment of rent and an unlawful detainer?
  3. San Francisco rent control has gone so far left that is promoting tenants and criminals to take advantage of housing providers. San Francisco Board of Supervisors and the Mayor, CA Assembly members, senators and Governor encourage more “victims” to blame others and not look for real solutions. They allow tenants to utilize rent control to abuse housing providers by continuously making laws to “protect” those who do not contribute and leech on the society.

23) What decision did you make after this ordeal happened?

I am not going to rent out my property anymore because I cannot afford the cost of attorney fees and I have no rights as a property owner in San Francisco; especially since the legislature protects only tenants and does not offer protection to all citizens equally.

24) What changes would you like to see by sharing with your legislature and share with the public; and any other comments?

  1. My hope is that my very unique case can be prioritized and expedited by the court. 
  2. My case exemplifies the loopholes of our judicial system and procedures which allow criminals to drag on cases like this for so long, continue to harm and punish the hard working class, and take away property ownership rights yet permit criminals to continue to take advantage people like me. This is a waste of my time and my taxpayer’s money.  Not paying rent is the 1st reason for eviction and writ of possession, it should be changed. 
  3. Housing providers should also have free attorneys, not all housing providers are rich and not all tenants in evictions are poor and victimized.  
  4. I believe some rent control can protect some vulnerable people but current rent control laws and regulations in San Francisco have gone so extreme that authorize and encourage people to exploit the legal loopholes to abuse housing providers. The San Francisco Board of Supervisors should recognize when someone is taking advantage of the system and of their tenant rights. This has obviously gotten out of hand with so many cases in San Francisco, and not only mine. 
  5. Our San Francisco Board of Supervisors, Mayor, CA Assembly members, CA Senators, and Governor should practice and preserve the US Constitution. 

Story taken by Tina Wong

The report stated above is true. We hereby authorize BetterHousingPolicies.org to share and publish it.

Story Link to Skyline TV: https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=2324417817863993

The story of a single family home owner B. L.

Summary: B.L. and her husband owns a single family home in Outer Mission of San Francisco, their nightmare began after …

Landlord Story Input Form: The intent of this form is used as a guidance for landlords to inform our legislatures in writing and allow them to understand more of landlords’ situations. BetterHousingPolicies.org will be keeping this for our record and share with the legislatures,  posting on our websites, social media and share with the public. It is very important that you are stating the facts and the actual event that happened. You may write it in your language and we will translate it into English. Please email it to tinacwong@betterhousingpolicies.org if you have a computer. Or Wechat us for help.  

Today’s date:  09/12/2019

Your initial: B.L.

Are you a registered voter? Yes

Tell us about you: I have a family of 5, my husband and I with 3 children. We immigrated to the US in 1976 and started to work within one week after arrival. My husband and I each worked 2 jobs to support the family. My husband was a handyman and a photographer; I was a seamstress and a waitress; in addition to taking classes in the evenings and weekends to improve ourselves. We have worked 2 jobs for many years to be able to purchase our first home and an investment property for our retirement. We were tenants for the first 2 years. 

What city did this happen?  San Francisco

Which district is this property located? Outer Mission

What type of property, condo, Single family residence (SFR), 2-4 units or 5 units and more? SFR-3 bedrooms and 2 baths all upstairs and no rooms or baths downstairs at the time of leasing. 

Is this a rent control unit or property? Yes

Why did you lease out part of your property if it was an inlaw unit?

My husband and I thought that we could retire on the rental income and it was our 1st home that we did not want to sell it. 

When did the lease start?  End of 1995; We started a new lease in approximately a few years later because 2nd son and 3rd moved out.  

Background of tenants at the time of leasing your property?

Original lease in 1995 was 5 people-mom, oldest son and his wife, 2nd son and 3rd son. I was told by the oldest son when were still friends that he had a rental property in Vallejo, was a taxi driver and owned a taxi with couple drivers working for him; 2nd son was a real estate agent and had 8 houses and 3rd son moved back to help mom’s business and the mom owned a farm in Philipine, I did not verify our conversations when we were still friends. The oldest son also told me that he would be retiring and move back to the Philippines next few years. 

When did you 1st find out the situation, you may just provide the year if you don’t remember the month and day?  2011

What was the situation and event, please describe in detail as much as possible:

After we purchased our first investment property that is a 3 bedrooms and 2 baths single family house in 1995 for $1,200, we leased it out to family of 5, parents and 3 sons. The mom reported to me that 2 of her younger sons moved out and should change to 3 tenants after 2 of the younger sons moved out. We always got along and were friends, we would send them Christmas gifts and they would invite us for coffee or tea the first five years until our 1st rent increase according to the San Francisco Allowable Rent Increase after 5 years. 

In 2011, one of the tenants’ younger son came to my house and gave me a letter stating that roof leaked which I had no knowledge and tenants never report to me, I used to periodically call the older son to see if everything ok and he said he would call me if any problems. We only drove by outside to check. We were surprised that the younger son (no longer my tenant) gave us the letter and not the oldest son who was the actual tenant.  I contacted the oldest son to arrange for a visit and inspect the place ourselves the very next day. The oldest son talked to me aside from his mom and asked me to partner with him to evict his 2nd brother who moved in without paying him rent after his 2nd brother lost all his money in real estate. I told him straight that I would not be involved in his family business. He was also speechless when I asked him why all above listed issues were not reported. 

We scheduled and hired a roofer to replace the roof the following week after 1st inspection. 

After a few days later, I received a notice of violation from the city that the door knob was broken, heater was not working, roof leak due to stains on the kitchen ceiling.  I scheduled an appointment for inspection and found that the tenant illegally and poorly constructed an inlaw unit with a shower room which did not have any proper exhaust pipes or insulations, shed in the backyard and cut my Cherry tree without my permission or approvals or any city permits. They also subleased to 2 separate tenants for the shed and the illegal inlaw unit. I asked why those additional things were not report at my 1st visit when I received a letter from his brother, he said that his family did not use heater and did not think that it was a big deal. 

What did you do to handle the situation on what was reported, please describe in detail as much as possible.

I contacted an attorney right away to learn what we can do since the tenant illegally constructed some rooms downstairs without my permission. My attorney help me to write a letter to the tenant to bring the condition to original conditions within a month without any evictions. The tenant moved out within 3 days and he told my attorney, I was so surprised that they moved out so soon. When we got inside the property, they damaged the property even more, got water all over the wood flooring. 

I hired a licensed contractor and building permits to restore the conditions and remove the illegal in-law. The building department came and told us that we could just use Clorox to clean up the kitchen ceiling, it was not a big deal.  

After 8 months they moved out, I received an attorney letter right before Thanksgiving suing us for $500,000 for damages due to stress and “mold”.  

How did the situation get resolved?

My attorney advised me to report to my insurance company and insurance would hire its attorney because it could be very expensive, like $30,000 to $50,000, so I did. 

The insurance attorney suggested me to go through mediation and agreed with him. I also hired the same attorney from the 1st incidence of same tenant since he knew the case and knew exactly what had happened. The tenant admitted that was his fault to build the illegal in-law so the price was reduced to $50,000. My attorney and insurance attorney advised me to settle with $50,000 because the insurance company will pay for it but not my own attorney fee; I would most likely be paying a lot more attorney fee out of my own pocket if I did not settle even though it was not my fault. My only option was to settle and not drag on any longer, it cost me a great deal of stress that I could not sleep every night due to the unfairness. 

How much money did it cost you including lawyer fee and construction fee?  

Approximately $10,000 of my own money for lawyer fees that I personally hired plus over $20,000 to rehabilitate the conditions.   

Did your insurance company pay any money to those tenants?

Yes, my insurance company settled $50,000 with the tenants without any choice. 

How much did you insurance premium go up after insurance paid the settlement?

My insurance premium went double after the case settled.

How did you feel about this ordeal? 

We felt unjust and still are.  Why did we get punished and penalized without doing anything wrong and tenants got rewarded by committing crimes and violating the lease. 

What did you learn from this ordeal?

I should have inspected my property inside more often to prevent it happened. I started to attend more landlord seminars to learn more about protecting my rights.  

What would you like to see by sharing with your legislatures and share with the public; and any other comments?

  1. I used to have great relationships with tenants; unfortunately, the lawmakers divided us with all “tenant protection laws”.  The current laws are encouraging enemy between tenants and landlords.
  2. I am looking for fairness and property ownership rights, Our lawmakers should stop protecting illegal acts and someone who violates mutual agreement on contracts.
  3. I do not want anyone to label me as a “rich landlord”. We have worked very hard to build our own retirement plan and did not come easy. 
  4. We need the lawmakers to protect the good and innocent people, not encourage more people to pretend to be victims and the worst would be the good people get punished. 
  5. It never came across our minds that we would be applying any government welfare despite our hardship, I believe that is saving the government funding.  My family just don’t want to be punished for not doing anything wrong.   
  6. Lawyers who present tenants should have a cap on how much money they can make; that would prevent all the frivolous lawsuits. 

The report stated above is true. We hereby authorize BetterHousingPolicies.org to share and publish it.

租客虐打小业主 Renter beat landlord in domestic violence

We sadly report a tenant-landlord  conflict that resulted in the bodily injury of the landlord and two counts of felony charges against the tenant. This incident has been widely reported by the Chinese language media on 1/21 and 1/22 on KTSF, World Journal and Singtao, AM1400 and AM1450, and on KCBS AM740 on 1/22 around 7am, and  SFNewsFeed on 1/23. Channel 2 and Channel 5 were also at the press conference.

A 60yr old Chinese immigrant small property owner from the Sunset District with broken English came to me at 6:30pm,  1/20/2015, and reported that she was beaten by her white tenant,  a college professor at an area community college on Monday night, 1/19/2015, at about 11:00 pm. She said because issues with the cleanliness of the common area of their residence, that she was lifted up by her tenant by her throat, choked and couldn’t cry for help. While struggling to get away, she was beaten with a glass beer bottle and was severely cut and bruised. A blood trail led from the dispute site at the basement all the way to the main floor. Four police cars and one ambulance came at around midnight. She had 5 stitches at UCSF hospital overnight, and was released late afternoon of the next day. The renter was also released from the police department at about the same time and was back at her home. She feared for her life going home and she came to me. I offered her to stay with me, but she has animals and relatives at home to care for.

According to the SPO, there has been a long history of battery and assault incidents (classified as domestic violence by the police as they happen within a home though the parties are just un-related roommates). She didn’t know her rights; she felt trapped with no way out, thinking how difficult the eviction process would be and how much she would have to spend on fees and reconstruction costs given the rented space may or may not have been warranted. She was intimidated by, yet sympathetic to the tenant, and never had reported the past incidents to the police, until it finally escalated to an uncontrollable and unacceptable crime. She paid a high personal and emotional price for it.

On the evening of Thursday 1/22/2015, further information was known. The tenant had posted a 5-digit sum on the 10% “purchase price” of the bail bond to bail himself out. He is charged with two counts of felony on “Assault with intent to do major damages”. Unfortunately, with the severity of these charges, I was told by the Taraval police station on Wednesday morning, that the Superior Court judge didn’t approve an Emergency Restraining Order at the night of the battery, and the tenant could still be released back to his home where the landlady also stays. I was also told that the tenant was plea bargaining with all parties involved, including the prosecutor and the property owner. Further information pending on the released and receipt of the full police report.

We at Betterhousingpolicies.org, are made up of immigrants who are renters or small property owners who were long-time renters. Our volunteers have been helping tenants and landlords to resolve their disputes then refer them to the proper organizations or attorneys for further help. But in this case, the balance of the law is tilted – the aggressor was able to go home and the victim who owns the home was afraid to return. There are volunteers helping the victim landlady with the law proceeding but even if so, it may take weeks for the tenant to be evicted. We not only feel that the housing law has clearly gone too far to protect bad tenants and robbed property owners their rights including personal safety, but are also deeply troubled by how uninformed property owners are on the complexity of the rent control ordinances.

The rent law needs to strike a balance to ensure members of the community can co-exist peacefully. City resources should also be made available to property owners’ groups to inform property owners about their rights, help ensure their safety and guide them through some court proceedings, just like the resources being made available to tenants. Please see how we can work together to restore trust and relationship in the community and let landlords and tenants be neighbors AND friends without living in fear.